Behavioral Patterns  «Prev  Next»

The Role and Function of the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern within the Context of Behavioral Patterns

In the taxonomy of software design patterns, the Behavioral Patterns stand out for orchestrating interactions, roles, and responsibilities among objects and classes. Within this paradigm, the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern, an extension of the traditional Visitor Pattern, emerges as an astute mechanism to add further functionalities to a composite object structure without encroaching upon its existing design. This essay examines the essence, mechanics, and implications of the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern within the broader landscape of Behavioral Patterns.
  1. Theoretical Foundation: At its core, the traditional Visitor Pattern allows one to add new virtual functions to classes without modifying them. Essentially, it decouples the operations performed upon an object from the object itself. The Hierarchical Visitor Pattern refines this by accommodating hierarchical or composite structures, enabling operations to be performed not just on individual objects but on an assemblage of interconnected objects.
  2. Mechanics and Structure:
    1. Element Hierarchy: Typically, in a composite structure, there exists a hierarchy of elements, often with a base element and several derived elements.
    2. Visitor Interface: This stipulates the contract that all concrete visitors must adhere to. It delineates methods for each type of element that can be visited.
    3. Concrete Visitor: Implementing the Visitor Interface, each concrete visitor encapsulates a specific operation or behavior that needs to be executed on the elements.
    4. Acceptor Interface: Incorporated into the elements, it outlines the accept method that takes a visitor as an argument.
  3. Operational Paradigm: The Hierarchical Visitor Pattern operates by allowing a visitor to traverse a composite structure and execute specific operations on various elements within the hierarchy. Each element in the hierarchy provides an "accept" method that effectively "accepts" a visitor, directing the visitor to the element in question.
  4. Significance and Implications:
    1. Extension without Modification: By adhering to the open-closed principle, one of the SOLID principles of object-oriented design, the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern allows for extending the operations on a composite structure without modifying the structure itself.
    2. Single Responsibility Principle: Each visitor encapsulates a singular operation, ensuring that every module or class adheres to a singular responsibility, fostering clarity and maintainability.
    3. Hierarchical Processing: It gracefully handles operations on composite structures, ensuring that operations are executed coherently across a hierarchy, be it aggregating data or transforming the structure.
  5. Potential Challenges: As sophisticated as the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern is, it is not devoid of challenges. The introduction of a new element or the removal of an existing one in the hierarchy necessitates a modification of the Visitor Interface, potentially leading to cascading changes in all concrete visitors. Furthermore, the pattern might introduce a level of indirection that could be perplexing for some developers, thereby steepening the learning curve.
  6. Applications in Modern Software Design: In contemporary software systems, the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern finds applications in document object models (DOMs), abstract syntax trees (ASTs), and other hierarchical data structures where operations like traversal, transformation, and validation need to be performed.
The Hierarchical Visitor Pattern is a testament to the versatility and evolution of behavioral patterns. By extending the classic Visitor Pattern to handle composite structures, it offers a refined lens to conduct operations on hierarchical data, ensuring modularity and maintainability. As with all design patterns, its potency is derived not from its innate design, but from its judicious application tailored to the exigencies of the software problem at hand.

Background Hierarchical Visitor Pattern

Provide a way to visit every node in a hierarchical data structure such as a tree.

Intent of the Hierarchical Visitor Pattern

Represent an operation to be performed on the nodes of a hierarchical object structure. Hierarchical Visitor lets one define new operations without changing the classes of the nodes on which it operates. Hierarchical Visitor overcomes the limitations of the traditional VisitorPattern by allowing a programmer to track traversal depth and short-circuit branch traversal.


Consider a file system represented using a hierarchical structure, such as that provided by the CompositePattern. The file objects are leaf nodes and the directories are the composite nodes. Now consider two operations on a file system:
  1. fully qualifying a file name and
  2. searching for a specific file.

To fully qualify a file name, we must traverse each of its parent composites. To do this, we start with a string representing the root composite, and concatenate each child composite until we reach the actual file object. We need to determine what composites (directories) are children of the root and which are its siblings. This requires we track when we are entering a composite and leaving a composite. If we enter the composite bar before we have left the composite foo, we know we have "foo/bar". However, if we leave foo before entering bar then foo and bar are siblings. This is quite impossible if equipped only with the traditional VisitorPattern as it only tells us when we are entering a composite node. To search a file system optimally, we need to take advantage of fully qualified names. If we are searching for root/foo2/bar3/file.dat, we do not need to search through the branches
  1. root/foo1/*,
  2. "root/foo2/bar1/*", or even
  3. "root/foo2/bar2/*".
Unfortunately, because the traditional VisitorPattern does not have the ability to conditionally traverse a hierarchical structure, we are left with only two choices.
(a) use an alternative means of traversal or (b) search even those branches that have no possibility of a match.
These two examples summarize the advantages of the HierarchicalVisitorPattern. One no longer needs to rely on multiple traversal techniques when the limitations of the traditional visitor pattern must be exceeded. We can generalize these limitations as:
  1. hierarchical navigation: the traditional VisitorPattern has no concept of depth. As a result, visitor cannot determine if one composite is within another composite or beside it.
  2. conditional navigation: the traditional VisitorPattern does not allow branches to be skipped. As a result, visitor cannot stop, filter, or optimize traversal based on some condition.